This is my final draft until now, please feel free to comment.
We Are Stealing Girl’s Childhood
We Are Stealing Girl’s Childhood
By Lisa Zecchinato
The average American will spend 3 years of their life
watching TV commercials. Yes, only commercials. We know that every type of
media sexualizes little girls including TV, music videos, lyrics, movies,
magazines, video games, the Internet and ads. We know that every day girls are
bombarded with sexualized images of all types and that the pressure to look
sexy is starting earlier and lasting longer.
Now, sex is nothing new when it comes to selling a product—you
have probably seen it years ago with the Brooke Shields commercial for Calvin
Klein or any other advertisement—but this obsession is definitely new when the
women used to sell these products are 5-year-olds.
As a parent, you probably try to avoid your child being
exposed to inappropriate content. Advertisements are everywhere and it is hard
to prevent your kids from watching them. The Internet is full of sexualization
of young girls, but normally little kids are not very interested in computers;
and if they are, a guardian can just cut the Internet on the child’s computer
or put some filter to it. However, when trying to avoid your child from
watching any sexual content on the TV, you might put on Disney Channel or
Discovery Kids. You might think that when watching those channels your child is
safe from sexualization. But you are wrong.
Even though the
shows played on kids’ channels may seem harmless and educational, the commercials run during them are
damaging and detrimental for your kids’ health.
Repeatedly, on channels such as Nickelodeon and Discovery
Kids, commercials for Bratz dolls are run. These commercials portray doe-eyed,
waist-baring dolls dressed in miniskirts
fishnet stockings, and feather boas. This does not only encourage young girls
to focus merely on looks and sexuality but also creates erroneous expectations
for young boys about how girls should dress and behave.
Recently, I was watching TV with my mother’s 5-year-old goddaughter. We
were watching Phineas & Ferb on Disney Channel and suddenly the ‘Bratz
Glammed Up’ commercial went on air. This commercial depicts girls who only care
about dying their hair green and blue and dressing in slutty black-and-pink
dresses.
I was about to make fun of that commercial and laugh at how pathetic
those girls looked when the 5-year-old turned around and said, “Mami, me
compras esto por favor?” (Mom, can you please buy me this?).
“No Francesca, no es tu cumpleaños”, (No Francesca, it is not your
birthday), her mother said.
“Me falta Phoebe y Roxxi para tener a todas las Bratz! Tia, me la compras?”, (I
need Phoebe and Roxxi to complete my Bratz collection. Tia, can you buy it for
me?), she then pleaded my mom.
Little children want to wear make-up, color their hair ridiculously and
dress like child prostitutes just because the over-played Bratz dolls
commercials are setting the stupid idea that make-up and sexy clothes are
essential to be accepted into girls’ minds.
According to market
research firm Experian, 43 percent of 6 to 9-year-old girls already use
lip-gloss; 38 percent use hairstyling products and 12 percent use other
cosmetics. These girls cover their faces with colored chemicals until they look
like drag queens, just as the girls in the Bratz doll’s commercials do.
I am almost
seventeen and do not wear make-up unless I go out. If I could survive societal
pressure without wearing make-up for fifteen years, I’m sure a 6-year-old can
have friends and still look pretty without covering her face with rainbow-like trash.
Now, it is true that the Bratz dolls commercials do not present much
sexuality when compared to some MTV shows or commercials. However, the Bratz
commercials are worrisome because they are targeted at 4-year-old girls, while
MTV shows are targeted at 15-year-olds and above.
Since kids under 7-years-old cannot tell the difference
between entertainment and a commercial trying to sell them something, they might
view these buggy-eyed trollop’s commercials in the same league
as Dora the Explorer or some other pointless ‘educational’ kids’ show. They
might view their cheap red-and-black lingerie as appropriate clothes and think
that dancing around a pole and kissing guys at the age of five is something
enlightening.
The Bratz Dolls commercials have been running since
2001, when the dolls were invented, and continue to this day. However, each
day, the commercials are becoming more sexualized.
Each day, more 6-year-old girls wear the clothes
and make-up of a 16-year-old. Each day, more girls view the clothes worn in Bratz
commercials as fashionable and want to wear them as well. Each day, more American
teenagers are having sexual intercourse.
But you may be wondering, what can be done to prevent kids being exposed
to this. We cannot ban kids from
watching TV.
Parents might feel incapable of protecting their children from the
media, but without the financial aid, a kid cannot purchase any heavily
advertised products.
The truth is that according to NAML, 12-year-old kids and younger
influence the household spending of over $60 billion. Not surprisingly, the
majority of this spending comes from inappropriate toys that appear frequently
in commercials.
If you don’t buy
those toys, your child won’t have them.
Your child may
cry, tell you, “I hate you!” or even be left out among their friends. But talk
to other parents; I’m sure they feel the same as
you about the Bratz dolls and their commercials.
I told my mother not to buy the Bratz dolls for Francesca, her
goddaughter. She bought her a memory game instead. At first, she was a little
bit disappointed; but eventually, she forgot about the Bratz and was still
happy.
So come on parents and other caring people, don’t buy these outrageous
toys that appear in TV commercials! By buying them, you are only harming youth.
Eventually, if people don’t buy the overly sexualized products, firms
will stop producing them and thus stop advertising them in commercials.
Help kids enjoy their childhood. Vote against the excessive sexualizing of
doll commercials with your wallet!
wow! this is awesome and well written. you really opened my eyes
ReplyDeleteA very interesting opinion editorial. You have definitely analyzed the brats commercial and how the media affects the perception the boys and girls have on beauty.
ReplyDeleteTry to use some vocal from the class in your op-ed
Over all it is great, good job.
Alaaaa. Lisa escribes demasiado increible. me encanto tu op-ed, aunque no estoy segura que es un op-ed. es como un persuasive essay? igual, me encanta. it is awsome, really.
ReplyDeletenow i HATE the bratz, haha. i didn't realize they increased the sexualization of girls.
good job!
When referring to such a controversial topic in which childhood is exposed to a world of vanity and an ideal image of beauty, the facts should be presented as direct as possible, the way you are doing. You are not directly judging with your own opinions, but the facts state the truth about this issue, and there is no need to give your opinion to realize the fact that this should not be happening.
ReplyDeleteYour organization has the adequate steps in order to follow a pattern to pass through every important detail and be able to get to the same conclusion that you give at the end.
The use of diction initially appeared excessively vulgar, especially when you referred to children on television being portrayed as "slutty" and as "child prostitutes". However, as you began to fully express your firm stance against the media's encouragement of what you describe as "sexualization", those harsh phrases not only seemed appropriate, but also supported your argument.
ReplyDeleteThe use of statistics as evidence to support your thesis was effective, and it definitely calls for the audience to think and act in a specific way.
Your colloquial tone is understandable, but remember that this is an Op-Ed, and therefore you should be cautious with syntax and grammar errors. For example, you should consider revising the prepositions used throughout the article.
Your title stood out because it had a grammatical error--you could change it to "We are stealing a girl's childhood", "we are stealing girls' childhoods", or change it altogether to make it sound better.
Lastly, you stated that if people don't buy "overly sexualized products, firms will stop selling them, and thus stop advertising them". Is this necessarily true or realistic? Maybe sexual appeal has become an engraved part of the modern culture. If you feel that people will never stop buying these products, you could provide an alternative solution.
Overall, your Op-ed left a strong impression on me and you have definitely mastered the use of pathos to appeal to the emotions of the audience. It is a very strong piece of writing.
This is very interesting, something like this has never crossed my mind before. It is just incredible how young girls are being exposed to this type of commercials and parents cannot really protect them from an early sexualization.
ReplyDelete